|
LATEST!
App. No P052310
1st campaign
2nd campaign
Downloads
Your reactions
Feedback
Islington election
Photo gallery
Press coverage
Schools support
Background
Govt support
Members only
|
Members and supporters have been vociferous in and highly supportive of the campaign to save the Wimbledon of Squash. A sample of the hundreds of emails and objections over the course of the past 12 months is shown below. Thanks and keep them coming.
Some of your comments on the latest planning applications: ..."I recently bought a flat in Islington and work on Bunhill Row. I joined Holmes Place on Bunhill Row last year as I was keen to play squash regularly. Playing the game is very enjoyable and helps me stay fit. However, Holmes Place only has two courts, which are consistently fully booked. In addition, members have to pay £5 for a 40 minute session in addition to a hefty monthly membership fee. These factors meant I played little squash over the last year, was regularly frustrated in my attempts to do so, and felt cheated financially when I was finally able to book a court! I cancelled my membership last month and joined Lambs instead ... If Lambs is forced to close, I will be forced into a very frustrating situtation: my options are to quit playing the game, or rejoin a gym that offers expensive access to limited squash facilities." DD
...I
am writing to register my STRONG OBJECTION to both the applications ...
which would effectively end the long and successful run of Lambs Squash
Club in (central) London. The Club is unique in that it provides world
class squash facilities in the heart of the City - CM ...Squash is played widely by workers in the city, contributing greatly to general health and quality of life - JO ...I've objected - GW ...I
strongly object to plans to demolish this important sporting facility
... the area is a thriving city environment where workers and local
residents alike benefit from the amenity of this rare above ground
sport and squash facility....( and I have urged players around the
county to do the same) - GK ...the
only other available squash courts in the city are at Finsbury Leisure
Centre which has only 4 courts ... not enough for the 1000+ membership
of Lambs - JB ...an average of 3 new members are joining
Lamb's on a daily basis at the moment... most appear to be squash
players So the contention that squash is dead in the city is very far
from being anywhere close to the truth. - NB ...City of
London has far too many offices and nowhere near enough sports
facilities. If the 9 squash courts at Lamb's Squash Club are demolished
then there will be only a very few squash courts in the city, almost
all of them based in very expensive gyms where there is no real
encouragement of squash. The club is also one of the few sociable
sporting clubs in London,..- SS .. pulling the courts down
would force many ... out of the game. How poor an enorsement would it
be to discourage sport at a time when we have just won the olympic bid
and are all being encouraged to lead a healthier lifestyle - CM ...(Lambs)
keeps fit some most capable workers who would not have other times when
they can play (due to) family committments. It is one of the best clubs
in the country and is part of City Life.I immensely value it. Please
reject these applications. - PB ...There is a petition
instruction attached which I'd appreciate your time in completing. ...
please put at least this much back into the game that I know you all
love. Then take it a further step and send it to others like you and
me, who love squash and would want their children to have the chance to
enjoy it, as much as you and I have done. - AH ..Its the only
"international" competition quality venue in the City with proper
viewing galleries. It is an ambassador club known throughout the world,
and is the home of squash in London.... Adds character to the area
while servicing the needs of squash players throughout the city. .. It
is part of the City's work hard play hard culture. Services the needs
of league squash players from all over London who play against its top
seeded Middlesex Premiership teams. - SM ...I've objected...
having joined Lambs following the closure of squash courts at another
club (to make way for a more "profitable" spinning room) I was
disappointed to hear that Lambs too may disappear from the City
landscape.- SW ...I would object to the implications... that
the squash courts are in some way underutilised and that capacity for
squash players exists close by in other facilities... The courts are in
fact rarely anything other than fully booked between 11.40 and 2pm and
from around 5 to 5.20pm in the afternoon... As a member, it is often
impossible to get courts for peak times ...Essentially, the courts are
heavily oversubscribed at peak times. Therefore the suggestion that the
14 other squash courts within 650m of the site could easily accommodate
the existing demand for squash courts at Lambs is palpably untrue....- GB ..It
is shameful that one of the last remaining world class squash
facilities in the country let alone in London is being threatened....
(this will) deprive the working and resident population of a ..
cherished amenity....- JR ,,,
squash (is like) chess, played on the run to test you and your partner
to the limit. This (demolition threat) is just another test .. of our
resolve ....I propose this centre be saved ....- JM ...I
cannot see how the shutting down of the City's premier squash club with
over 300 active league players alone and no sensible alternative
facilities can possibly be justified on anything but pure short term
commercial considerations . It is an important amenity which provides.
significant health benefits to a wide range of people which has
positive effects on the broader economy. Any closure would certainly
fly in the face of the propaganda built up to support London's
successful bid for the 2012 Olympics......- RA Keep up the
good work.... everyone I know at the club supports (this campaign) ...
I read the planning report - the assumption that so many people can
simply be re-housed is ridiculous. Removing Lambs will deplete squash
facilities by 39% in the area. This is significant especially given how
busy all 9 courts at Lambs always are! -MD ...(At) a time
when the government is trying to encourage us all to maintain our
fitness and stay healthy, when this city is hosting the OlympicGames in
a few years, trying to close down sporting facilities is madness. It is
very difficult to play any sport in the centre of this overcrowded city
and commuting each day doesn't make it any easier to make time for
sport. I have been playing squash regularly at Lambs for seven years
and rely on these facilities to keep me sane during the week. I do not
play in the Lambs leagues as we have a healthy league within our
company (all games are played at Lambs) which is now in jeopardy.
Consequently, we may not have been included in the dubious figures
quoted in the Clan applications. I can vouch for the difficulty of
booking a court during peak hours and nearly always have to play after
2pm when it is slightly quieter. .... The Clan applications state that
the squash courts within the facility are generally used between 12.30
pm and 2.00 pm and 6pm and 8pm each day. On average, only 375 squash
bookings are placed for the 9 squash courts each week. These figures do
not make sense, 375 bookings equates to each squash court bring booked
for more than 5.5 hours every day, not the 3.5 hours they claim. Even
if other squash clubs in London may have spare capacity, I am highly
sceptical that they do at peak times when everyone is able to play! I
have tried and failed to play at the Finsbury public facilities as it
is so busy. For London to be taken seriously as a leading global city,
it needs more facilities like these for its workers, not less..-RM.
...Lambs squash is a "city" squash club and hence attracts players that
work in the city. It is unique in offering NINE squash courts, many
workers in the city use the squash courts during lunchtime and
evenings. To mention a small percentage of locals play squash could be
said of virtually any gym in the country...There are a number of other
gyms in the area, but they are double the price and don't offer the
squash environment. These gyms ... put squash content very low down in
their order of priorities........The (alleged) decline in membership
(must in part ) be due to the fact that Lambs has relocated its
existing sales person not once but twice in recent months... It saddens
me to hear about the decline of squash, but removing NINE courts will
not help ...! Surely it would be better to ... (make the facility) more
accessible to the local community i.e. schools and help promote the
sport to a younger generation. Closure of Lambs WOULD result in a
shortage of squash courts. Splitting the members over 4/5 different
clubs would dilute the squash club membership and the strength of team
squash at Lambs... This mass of (9) courts attracts a lot of squash
players and hence a lot of top quality squash players i.e. squash
professionals. To dilute the availability of courts will dilute the
quality of squash ... and ... cause great harm to the sport. Squash is
.. about competing against players and (this) requires a concentration
of players...GLL ...I've objected - ADW ...I've objected- we need decent available squash facilitiesin the city! - MK ...I
made a decision to take up my current job due to its close location to
Lambs and (arranged) lunch flexibility (so I could) play squash ….
excercise at lunch is a necessity for me not … a luxury. (My former
club was demolished) so I decided to move to a job closer to Lambs to
benefit from the excercise and enjoyment (that) make me a more
productive and effective employee. I have turned down a variety of
jobs outside of London purely because of Squash and Lambs. (This)
squash club offers me an environment to network with my peers…(no other
club I know) offers what Lambs does - namely a squash league and
environment par excellence. The planning application...make (s)
reference to "other clubs" in the vicinity offering the same service,
which is a nonsense. (No other) club offers the variety of players
that Lambs does nor the training standards. We have ex world standard
players who coach. (As for) opportunities for the younger members -
when I was growing up, I would often spend time at the (local) squash
club watching more established players. In a sense it kept me off the
streets and (later) gave me a … beneficial pastime. I suggest that a
lot of younger up and coming players would lose out on such an
opportunity (if Lambs were to go) which is a loss in the long run for
the community as a whole. How will the younger members of our community
benefit from yet another office/ residential block?- AA ...As a member of the club.I would like to register my objection to this (application) - FS ...the
club has contributed to the enjoyment of tens of thousands of players
and spectators from around the country and worldwide, as a renowned
base for excellent squash and a site for some of its leading
competitions....Squash is one of this country’s strongest sports, if
not the strongest, and would be our best chance of a medal if it were
to take its deserved place in the Olympics...There is no remotely
comparable facility in central London, and anyone with the slightest
familiarity with the sport will confirm that any attempts to argue
otherwise are nonsense. A gym complex with a couple of appended courts
with no internal leagues, no representative teams and no club spirit is
not a true squash club, any more than a nondescript playing field is a
football club. - JG ...I strongly object to the proposed
destruction of a valuable sports club that is unique in the City of
London in terms of its promotion and development of squash - a sport
that Britain has a very strong global reputation in. Over the past 10
or so years a number of other City squash clubs have closed or reduced
courts (for example, Cannons, Cutlers). At a time of considerable
public concern over obesity, growing impact of stress and Britain's
long hours culture - how can we seriously be thinking about closing
down an amenity that provides the opportunity for healthy and
de-stressing activity, unless there is some suitable replacement in the
same location - PL I believe that replacing Lambs with a
residential/commercial development will deprive the city district of an
irreplaceable sporting and social facility.... Lambs really is the most
important squash club in the UK and possibly the highest profile club
worldwide. It is no understatement to say that it is the
Wimbledon-equivalent of a popular and important sporting activity.
Losing this facilitity would be a great loss to capital's sporting
facilities. - JH ...I play squash and spent a long time
looking for a club in the city with proper squash facilities. No other
club in the city can rival Lambs in this regard and I have no doubt
that if Lambs were to close the people who play and train at Lambs
would be unable to find a club that can offer facilities of an
equivalent standard.... - CB ... But the list of facilities
alone doesn't begin to convey what a valuable club this is. It is in
many ways to squash what Wimbledon is to tennis. The club has nearly
1,300 members of which about 800 are squash players - by far the
largest club in London, and possibly the largest in the UK. It has 40
leagues with 270 league players. It has country standard teams. It is
also used frequently by top professional players either for
tournaments, or for coaching/exhibition matches. Squash is one of the
sports that the UK excels at. Myself and others who support Lambs were
greatly cheered by the authorities ruling on the previous application
to the demolish the club. You will hopefully receive many other
representations supporting the club. I really urge you to do whatever
you can to help those campaigning to save Lambs. It IS something very
valuable that, once gone, will be lost forever.... - BF ..I
work near the Monument and use the club over 200 times a year. I
strongly object to the proposed removal of this unique sporting
facility. So many people use this facility that unless I book a court
as early as the rules allow i.e. phone 7 days in advance at 0700 in the
morning to book a court I do not get one. This means a lot of players
use the club - contrary to the submission from the developers. The
Government is trying to encourage sport at the moment. ... My
experience of Lambs is in stark contrast with the assertions of the
developers. The submission from the developers belittles its unique
nature and its popularity and, laughably, describes its effect on the
neighbourhood as "generating an atmosphere of an inhospitable and
threatening back-alley’. I would urge any body voting on this matter to
visit the site and speak to the members rather than taking the biased
submission from the developers.... - AP ...Paragraph 11 of
PPG17 states..:-sports and recreational facilities that are of high
quality, or of particular value to a local community, should be
recognised and given protection by local authorities through
appropriate policies in plans...Lambs squash club is without question
the premier squash facility in Islington and in London as a whole, and
its loss will be keenly felt throughout central London. Lambs is a
purpose built squash facility with 9 courts, including a glass backed
exhibition court with a 250 seater auditorium for which there are no
alternative venues of comparable size or amenity within the greater
London area. In practice Lambs is irreplaceable....The members of Lambs
represent bona fide stakeholders and should have been consulted and
given the opportunity to make an offer for the club with the intention
of placing it in trust for the use of future generations...I submit
that incontrovertibly Lambs Squash Club is a fixture of International
and National repute. As such I request that this planning application
be rejected and the facility given a special protected status for the
benefit of a sport in which the UK excels worldwide, and to the
advantage of future generations of squash players.. TK Eat
healthy, do more exercise, isn't that was our government are telling us
? ....I work in London every day, commuting from Grantham (where I am a
member in my local club) and losing Lambs would leave a large gap in my
day. What cost a few more apartments. KH ..I have been a
member of Lamb's Club since 1986...In my view :..The demolition of the
Club itself would be the loss of a major amenity. It is a landmark
squash club, well known not just in London but amongst those involved
in squash around the world. It is the biggest squash club in the
City...I can think of no comparable club within two or three miles of
Lamb's, let alone in the immediate vicinity. It offers nine squash
courts; one show court which can and does accommodate many spectators
and two smaller show courts...It is a major facility for employees of
businesses in the area and helps attract and retain these employees...
On a wider issue, the loss of Lamb's will be a major blow for the sport
of squash in England...I believe it has previously been suggested that
an application be encouraged for mixed development which would include
within it the survival of a squash/fitness club. Subject obviously to
other planning and local considerations, such an application would be
more likely to have my support.RH I object to planning
application P052310 on the grounds that:..This is a loss of a local
amenity. Lambs squash club is a very large squash club which achieves a
critical mass of members where players of all standards are able to
find many players of similar standards to play. The courts are over
subscribed at peak times and the displacement of these players would
cause severe strain on other local amenities...The site is located on
the edge of Islington and the City. It is an amenity not only for
Islington but also for central London and should be viewed as such.AR I
most strongly object to the planning application submitted as they would entail
the removal of a very valuable asset, namely 9 squash courts, including 2
championship courts and gym facilities, which are currently used by some 1250
people (Lambs membership in April 05), who would NOT be able to be accommodated
by other squash facilities in the area - NOTHING LIKE IT. The planning
application flies in the face of any reasonable person's view that: sport is
important for health and wellbeing (given growing obesity levels etc)
particularly that inner city sports facilities should be preserved, as they are
used by local people, including kids and older folk who cannot afford to use
Holmes Place etc); given that London hosts the Olympic Games in 2012 and that we
need to encourage sport at all levels; given that we do NOT need a 9-storey
block of flats on this site,
...- given that there IS a viable alternative, namely that the site is re-developed
in a way that retains the provision of squash and other sporting facilities,
while adding some residential accommodation, which would pay for the
redevelopment. Islington would (IMHO) be very ill-advised indeed to progress
with the current application. KMcL Member email to Islington South MP Emily Thornton: I
have been informed that you are the relevant MP with whom I should
lodge my sincerest dismay and regret regarding the proposed planning
applications with respect to Lambs Squash Club. The club is the eminent
squash venue in London. It provides 9 courts to over some 500 members.
In terms of squash facilities it is unrivalled across ... London. To
allow this centre of excellence to close would be a tremendous blow to
this community of players, the community itself and to the prestige of
sport in London... (It) would (rightly) cast doubt over the commitment
to sport and health that both your party and London as a whole has
espoused (with particular emphasis on the recent successful Olympic).
It would smack of hypocrisy....put quite simply - the club is thriving,
there is no suitable alternative, it will destroy the strong community
that has developed there, it has unrivalled facilities and it is very
much loved by all members past and present and has been home to many
squash greats. Please help save Lambs.MD I am a regular user of Lambs and I fully support the
campaign to save it and have registered my on-line objection with Islington
council.MR Lambs
has been a leading venue for 25 years for a sport which has a more
highly committed and social following than any conventional gym or
leisure centre operation. As a country the UK has four Englishmen in
the top 10 world rankings. How many other sports can claim that
achievement? Demolishing the Club would undermine both a sport in which
this country excels, and the enjoyment of the game for the many of us
amateurs who play there and develop their game thanks to the breadth
and depth of playing that the facility attracts. Lambs squash club is
without question the premier squash facility in Islington and in London
as a whole, and its loss will be keenly felt throughout central London.DF
I
joined Lambs in 2001 and like many would be denied the particular
health providing benefits it provides if replaced by flats. I urge you
to take into account fully the downside. Lambs is unique and could not
be replaced, are there not many other places suitable for flats ?
Would you be putting money before people and their wellbeing ? If
planning went ahead I suggest the downside would outweigh the benefit.RMcN
....My objections are as follows: - Council UDP policy should be to
maintain the Lambs Squash facility: "The Council supports the provision
of additional facilities for indoor sports, fitness and active leisure
pursuits." Sections 7.4.2, 7.4.3 & 7.4.5. Lambs provides
commercial indoor sports of a high std, used by a wide range of ages
and standard of Squash players up to top internationals. - Loss of leading venue Lambs
squash club is the premier squash facility in Islington and in London.
Lambs provides squash facilities that are not available elsewhere in
London. Lamb Squash Club represents an important amenity for the local
Islington residents as well as for people who live and / or work in the
City of London.- Loss of Lambs facility is not in keeping with
government planning advice PPG17 para 10 /11. This venue should be
protected because it offers facilities of a quality that are not
available elsewhere. This club should be given special status to allow
it to continue to support international, national and local squash.I
have been an active member of Lambs Squash Club for nearly 7 years.
Lambs is an important part of my working and social life. Given the
right opportunity I would wish to become a stakeholder in this
excellent facility.IC
...Among alternatives offered for
displaced Lambs members and cited in the planning application, are the
Islington boroughs own facilities: Finsbury Leisure Centre, Norman
Street. EC1V 3PU. A Lambs club member (one of two members excluded by
Lambs owner Mike Corby as a direct consequence of the successful
refusal of the first planning application) investigated at length this
the Finsbury club alternative and that of its sister club. Her findings
are: It would seem that there are collectively, between the two
(Islington municipal) clubs mentioned, 12 courts available, each with 5
(x5) weekday slots and 10(x2) weekend slots, accommodating 660 people
to play twice a week. The current total membership headcount of these
clubs is of the order of 24,800, 5000 of whom use the squash
facilities. If we assume at a conservative estimate that only half
these players are regular players (play twice per week), we would see
that the clubs are already very heavily (and probably over) subscribed
for squash. This became evident when in discussions directly with the
clubs they mentioned that peak hour booking saturation was great.
Given that Lambs had 1,243 members in April 2005 (numbers that have
improved over the past quarter), of whom some 800 are regular (squash)
players, playing at a conservative estimate, twice a week, we can see
that the facilities mentioned would be subject to significant pressure
to cope with the load of additional squash demand involved indeed, the
alternatives suggested do not appear feasible. Having been a member of
Lambs for 7 or 8 years I am disappointed that the facility looks to
have been sold without giving the members a chance to own or save it.
There are far more players at Lambs than anywhere in the City or
Surrounds and you would be depriving these people a chance to enjoy an
active sport, when it seems the country in encouraging active
lifestyles. The local resources without Lambs would not feasibly cope
with the influx of new players meaning that many of us would have to
either give up a sport we love or have to play where we live outside of
the city. PM
I wish to object strongly to planning
application P052310 and 052334. I have been a member of Lamb’s Squash
Club for almost five years and regularly (ie at least twice a week)
play squash at Lambs. I would also add that other colleagues in this
office also use the facilities provided at Lambs. If Lambs Squash were
not available I would reluctantly have to give up playing squash. There
are very few alternative facilities in this location; those that do
have squash facilities are of variable standard and have a limited
number of courts. As I work close to Lamb’s I have found that Lamb’s
provide an excellent facility to take regular exercise. If Lamb’s were
to close I would no longer have this opportunity since it would be
impractical to find a squash club nearer home and play in the evening.
I would add that this month (November 2005) a further four divisions
have been added to the Squash league at Lambs to cater for the
continuing influx of members. I think this demonstrates well the
popularity of the sport and the requirement for a facility the size of
Lambs to continue to be available in the City. I therefore hope that
the Council will take full account of the many hundreds of people that
work in Islington and contribute to the Borough and who rely
significantly on the social and squash opportunities provided by Lambs.
Please reject outright the planning proposals represented by P052310
and 052334.NPL.
. Join our action
mailing list include me in
Back
|